The Bush Administration proposed a new foreclosure relief plan today in response to the mortgage crisis. The plan encourages lenders to write down loans and shift risk to the government-backed FHA program.
Hoping to assist more than 100,000 homeowners, the administration announced their intention to expand the FHASecure program. The expansion will allow the FHA to insure new mortgages for struggling borrowers, including those with ARMs and those who owe more than their homes are worth.
Not everyone will qualify though. High risk borrowers and borrowers who missed more than just a couple of mortgage payments will be turned away. Approval will also depend on a lender’s willingness to write down the mortgage principal owed. The maximum amount that could be borrowed under the expanded program would be either 90 or 97 percent of the home’s value, depending on the borrower’s risk profile.
Democrats are expected to oppose the effort. They are in the midst of writing more aggressive legislation to deal with the foreclosure problem. Although their legislation also calls for expansion of the FHA program, there are a lot of other provisions in the bill.
The FHA’s Financial Woes
Although both Democrats and Republicans are looking to the FHA to rescue homeowners in trouble, there is some question as to whether or not the agency is equipped to deal with the foreclosure crisis.
By its own estimates, the FHA will be operating in the red this year. Congressional officials are projecting a $1.4 billion shortfall in fiscal 2009 for the agency. If this happens, American taxpayers will be forced to subsidize the FHA for the first time in its 74-year history.
Some housing officials are now blaming the bad ink on an FHA program that allows seller-financed down payment loans. Under the program, sellers arrange to cover buyers’ down payments. The seller concessions are generally added to the total cost of the loan.
Only 2 percent of FHA insured loans were seller-financed down payment loans in 2000, but they grew in popularity during the boom and the FHA did nothing to keep the program in check. By 2007, seller-financed down payment loans accounted for a whopping 35 percent of all FHA loans.
The problem with this is that the foreclosure rate on seller-financed down payment loans is two to three times that of other loans, putting the FHA’s portfolio in a very precarious position.
Already, the FHA backs 3.8 million loans worth approximately $365 billion. If Congress and the Bush Administration have their way, the agency will be greatly expanded. Since the FHA has a government insurance fund of only $20 billion, and statistics show that 25 percent of FHA insured borrowers go into default again after a workout, there is almost no doubt the agency will have problems handling all the loans that do end up in foreclosure.
3 responses so far ↓
1 grandma // Apr 10, 2008 at 8:20 am
This is not the first time taxpayers have bailed out FHA. In 1988 the UFMIP was added to the insurance cost of obtaining an FHA loan (a result of losses in the “oil patch” days). Purchasers & sellers, who are taxpayers, contribute those funds to HUD insurance pools. The idea has always been that the program insurance would cover losses. Issue now is whether the program can find a way to save itself (risk-based premiums are being considered.) Government subsidy is one solution that might help keep the program from pricing itself out of existence. Other solutions would continue to put pressure on home purchasers and sellers by increasing the cost of insurance.
2 punstress // Apr 10, 2008 at 5:39 pm
Call me ignorant, but how is it a down payment when the seller gives “concessions,” but then adds it back to the loan? And if it’s added to the loan, why do they call it seller-financed? The buyer is the one financing it. I don’t understand!
3 Anonymous // Apr 16, 2008 at 2:06 pm
[...] I amfacingforeclosure.com [...]
You must log in to post a comment.