Fed Chairman Urges Banks to Reduce the Amounts Borrowers Owe

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke publicly urged lenders yesterday to forgive a portion of the principal owed on loans. Bernanke insists the time has come for banks to consider this tactic if they want to prevent foreclosures. 

There is no hard data to quantify how many homeowners are making the decision to walk away from their troubled mortgages, but the general consensus is that the numbers are high enough for lenders to be legitimately concerned.

So what’s a bank to do?

According to Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke, the best thing banks can do to combat the “walk away” trend is to slash the amounts owed on delinquent loans. This was the solution he proposed yesterday to the Independent Community Bankers of America. As one might imagine, the idea received a lukewarm response from bankers.

Nevertheless, Bernanke insisted that restoring equity with a principal reduction could be the most effective way of preventing foreclosures and delinquencies among borrowers who are underwater in their mortgage.

“The fact that many troubled borrowers have little or no equity suggests that greater use of principal write downs or short payoffs, perhaps with shared appreciation features, would be in the best interest of both borrowers and lenders,” Bernanke told the crowd.

Principal balance reductions have been very rare so far. The banks that are offering modifications typically deal in loan extensions or rate reductions.

Bernanke reports that most lenders are reluctant to forgive portions of mortgage debt because it could establish a trend that forces them to write down the principal again and again if home prices continue to fall.

The Fed Chairman argued that while this may be true, lenders still have the opportunity to mitigate losses. He backed up the claim with a recent study that estimates total losses exceed 50 percent of the principal balance in the average subprime foreclosure.

Support for Bernanke

The speech Bernanke made yesterday flies in the face of everything Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said just one day earlier:

“Being underwater does not affect your ability to pay your mortgage,” Paulson said in his speech. “Any homeowner who can afford his mortgage payments, but chooses to walk away from an underwater property is simply a speculator–and one who is not honoring his obligations.”

What this means is that Bernanke may now be at odds with the Bush Administration. It is very unlikely that Bush, Paulson or anyone else from that camp will endorse the write-down strategy.

On the other hand, the Democrats are keen to put their hands on the problem and may be willing to offer a stamp of approval in the next day or two.

The most opposition will naturally come from banks and investors, who have already taken a beating and may not be looking for seconds.

There Are 2 Responses So Far. »

  1. This is BS! I guess I could agree with Bernanke if the banks wouldn’t spread the effects of these self made losses out into the general population.

    The banks knew where this was all headed and probably assumed that it was better to make this a major crisis that a little one (which would more likely end up not scaring folks into rescuing them with public money).

    I urge anyone that has money in a bank that isn’t FDIC insured to move your money and see what types of banking services are covered if a bank fails. Let the accountability lay at the feet of the lenders and borrowers. There’s no way to avoid a fiancial downturn made bigger by this mess but the rational folks that either didn’t get gold fever or the folks who timed their involvement well shouldn’t carry the load.

  2. What kind of plan is this? People should not be saved because of their own poor choices? What does this say for those who waited out?

    the doc

Post a Response

You must be logged in to post a comment.